|
|
Is Russia Falling Prey to the ‘Resource Curse’? |
 |
-
its oil and
gas wealth condemns it to economic instability, social inequality and
political authoritarianism
-
oil and gas
played an important role in the Soviet economy, and the collapse of oil
prices in the 1980s is now widely cited as one of the main factors
precipitating the collapse of the USSR in 1991
|
-
resource
curse advocates argue that the resulting liberalisation in the 1990s was
just a temporary phenomenon, and that Russian democracy was doomed to fail
once the oil price went back up again
-
global
experience strongly suggests that oil is bad for democracy and bad for
sustained economic growth
-
there are no
examples of a successful transition to democracy in a country where oil
generates more than one third of its export earnings
-
the tendency
of oil revenues to delay modernisation; their use to buy off social protest
(the rentier effect); or their use to fund a repressive state apparatus
Resource Cursed or Blessed? |
-
Russia
is different from other resource-cursed economies
-
resource
curse had not prevented modernisation
-
Russia
is clearly a modern society, as measured by urbanisation, education and
industrialisation
-
Russia in
2006 is more dependent on resource exports than was the Soviet Union of
1985, yet it is also more democratic
-
in contrast
to other resource-dependent economies, Russia’s post-Soviet privatisation
resulted in a pluralistic ownership structure in the oil industry
-
the oil
ministry was split into a dozen independent corporations with hundreds of
small independent companies created as middlemen for oil operations
-
this
pluralisation led to intense political bargaining in Russia, both
‘vertically’ between the federal centre and regional bosses, and
‘horizontally’ between rival companies
-
natural gas
assets were kept separate from oil, and were privatised into a single
nationwide corporation, Gazprom
-
Gazprom
served as an important political resource for the state, domestically and
internationally, and balanced out the fierce takeover battles that erupted
among the oil companies
-
Russia’s
resource endowment is not limited to oil and gas. It has a massive metals
industry including iron and steel, non-ferrous metals such as copper and
nickel, and precious metals such as gold and diamonds
-
the metal
barons developed multi-billion dollar industries largely independent from
the oil and gas companies
-
of the 33
Russians on Forbes’ 2006 list of billionaires, only 12 are clearly
identified as coming out of the oil and gas sector, while 15 were based in
the metals industry (often merged with coal interests)
-
among the 87
magnates on the 2008 list, 15 originated in oil and gas, as compared with 22
in banking, 20 in mining and metals, 11 in real estate/construction, and
eight in retailing
-
the Russian
economy is a more complex and differentiated political economy than the
‘resource curse’ label would usually imply
-
Russia’s
statist tradition overlaps and supplants the ‘resource curse’ in complex
ways that make predictions based on the experiences of other countries
unreliable

Sources:
-
Rutland, Peter (2008) 'Putin's Economic Record: Is the Oil Boom
Sustainable?', Europe-Asia Studies, 60:6, 1051—1072.
-
ßêîâ Ïàïïý:
«Òåìï èçìåíåíèé è óðîâåíü ïðååìñòâåííîñòè â ýêîíîìè÷åñêîì ÿäðå
áëèçêè ê òåì, êîòîðûå èìåþò ìåñòî â ñòàáèëüíûõ ðàçâèòûõ ñòðàíàõ».
Politcom.ru.
Accessed on 2 February 2009.
|
|
|
|