|
The fact that
Russia did not have a normal system for the transfer of power was
one of the main reasons for its troubles and setbacks. Over the past
century five of its ten leaders died in office, three were swept
away by revolutions, and one was removed as a result of a
conspiracy.
|

Twentieth-Century Russian Rulers
Figure |
Period in power |
Reason for end
of
office |
Nicholas II |
1894-1917 |
Revolution |
Alexander Kerensky |
1917 |
Revolution |
Vladimir Lenin |
1917-24 |
Death |
Joseph Stalin |
1924-53 |
Death |
Nikita Khrushchev |
1953-64 |
Conspiracy |
Leonid Brezhnev |
1964-82 |
Death |
Yuri Andropov |
1982-84 |
Death |
Konstantin Chernenko |
1984-85 |
Death |
Mikhail Gorbachev |
1985-91 |
Revolution |
Boris Yeltsin |
1991-99 |
Constitutional transfer of power |
Yeltsin was
the only one who left the Kremlin voluntarily before the end of his
term and handed over power to a successor,
Vladimir Putin, who was appointed by him and approved by the
parliament precisely as the law required.
His departure was a peaceful constitutional procedure and set an
important precedent, serving to entrench a system for the democratic
transfer of power and thus preserve continuity and stability in
politics.
Even more
importantly, Yeltsin’s period marked a revolution in Russia. An
entire order, based on the political,
economic, and ideological system of Soviet Marxism-Leninism, was
overthrown. The foundations for the command economy and the
one-party dictatorship no longer exist. They have been replaced by a
new set of economic and political institutions, founded on different
constitutional and ideological premises. They are still fragile and
uncertain, but they are a world apart from the past.
Despite the
many justified criticisms that can be made of Yeltsin’s presidency,
under him Russia made enormous strides in the direction of a
democratic and market-oriented society. Yeltsin’s chief ambition as
the leader of the new Russia was to create the conditions under
which the revival of totalitarianism would be impossible. The jury
is still out, debating the verdict of whether he succeeded in this
aim. Yet it is hardly possible to ignore the following positive
developments.