|
|
Main Tenets of Classical Marxism |
Russia’s
development in the postreform era made clearer with each passing
year the utopianism of the Narodniks’ hopes of a peasant
revolution. Some of them began to question the belief in a
special destiny of the Russian people and its predetermined
movement towards a communal organization of life. The experience
of Western Europe seemed to suggest that capitalism was, after
all, a necessary stage on the road of human progress. The era of
the bloody revolutions of the 1840s, which had so unsettled A.
Herzen and made him spurn Western European socialist theories,
was now in the past. European workers had won the right to
participate in the political process. The popularity of
social-democratic parties which expressed the interests of wage
labor was on the rise. And so was the influence and reputation
of Marxism as the ideology of the working class. |
 |
Marxism
represented a particular type of Socialism. Its founders were two
German philosophers, Karl Marx
(1818-1883) and his life-long friend and collaborator
Friedrich Engels
(1820-1895). Working for several decades, starting in the turbulent
1840s, they had constructed a huge and comprehensive, albeit not
entirely consistent, philosophical system. Their ideas were first
presented in a systematic form in 1848 in the celebrated
Manifesto of the Communist Party. They were then developed more
thoroughly in the three volumes of Marx’s Capital. The
intellectual roots of Marxism included the eighteenth century
Enlightenment, classical economics, utopian socialism and German
idealistic philosophy - in other words, some of the main traditions
of Western thought. |
Most
importantly, Marx and Engels tried to find a rational formula, a
comprehensive social hypothesis that would sum up the evolution of
mankind and indicate the course of its future development. One of
the key elements of their theory was the idea of the
natural-historical character
of social development. The essence of it was that society developed
in accordance with its own intrinsic laws which were no less
objective than the laws of nature. For this reason each social
formation appears only then and there, when and where appropriate
conditions have matured for it. It subsequently gives way to a next
formation when that new formation has been prepared by a different
set of objective and subjective conditions.
In this
sense, Marx presented social development as a natural
social-historical process. To use a metaphor, just as a foetus in a
mother’s womb has to pass through necessary preliminary stages
before it becomes a self-sustaining living organism, so, too,
social systems are conceived, develop, pass from one qualitative
stage to the next in accordance with certain objective laws.
The second
fundamental Marxist principle in the explanation of historical
process is materialism. Unlike idealism, which believes that it is the
consciousness of men that determines their existence, materialism
looks for objective foundations of the consciousness itself and
finds them in the material life of people, in their concrete social
conditions. Materialism as a methodological principle was used by
Marx to uncover an economic base of society in the form of the mode
of production. He argued that the mode of production of the material
means of existence conditioned the whole process of social,
political and intellectual life. It was not the consciousness of men
that determined their existence, but, on the contrary, it was their
social existence that determined their consciousness. Thus, in a
complex description of historical events and social structures a
certain objective foundation was discovered that seemed to hold the
key to the understanding of the evolution of human society.
|
|
|
Tsarist Russia |
|
Images &
Video |


 |
|